Assessing the validity of national quality measures for coronary artery disease using an electronic health record

Nationally endorsed, clinical performance measures are available that allow for quality reporting using electronic health records (EHRs), but how well they reflect actual quality of care has not been studied. We performed a retrospective electronic medical chart review comparing automated measurement with a 2-step process of automated measurement supplemented by review of free-text notes for apparent quality failures for all patients with CAD from a large internal medicine practice using a commercial EHR. There were 7 performance measures included the following: antiplatelet drug, lipid-lowering drug, beta-blocker following myocardial infarction, blood pressure measurement, lipid measurement, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol control, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker for patients with diabetes mellitus or left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Profiling the quality of outpatient CAD care using data from an EHR has significant limitations. Changes in how data are routinely recorded in an EHR are needed to improve the accuracy of this type of quality measurement. Validity testing in different settings is required.

Author(s): 
Persell SD, Wright JM, Thompson JA, Kmetik KS, Baker DW
Journal: 
Arch Intern Med
Publication Year: 
2006
Publication Month: 
Nov
Volume: 
166
Issue: 
20
Page Number: 
2272-7