This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://digital.ahrq.gov/contact-us. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.
Please go to digital.ahrq.gov for current information.

An interactive computerized protocol for the management of hypertension: effects on the general practitioner's clinical behaviour

Authors
Brownbridge G, Evans A, Fitter M, Platts M
Journal
J R Coll Gen Pract
Publication Date
1986 May
Volume
36
Issue
286
Pages
198-202
  • HIT Description: Decision support system using a computerized care protocol with alerts. More info...
  • Purpose of Study: Assess the effect of the computerized care protocol with alerts on physicianÕs system usage and delivery of care during consultations.
  • Years of study: Not Available
  • Study Design: Pre-Post
  • Outcomes: Impact on health care effectivness/quality, Other outcome
Summary:
  • Settings: Two general practices in Sheffield, UK participated in the study. One had 4 physicians with 8,000 registered patients, and the other had 7 physicians with 20,000 patients
  • Intervention: A computerized care protocol with alerts for the management of hypertension was compared to a paper protocol and non-protocol periods.
  • Evaluation Method: Measures of the physician's delivery of care, and the usage of the system.
  • Description: The computerized protocol displayed prompts for specific investigations or decisions to be made by physicians during consultations with patients with chronic hypertension. It was designed by 2 of the investigators in the study and a hospital hypertension specialist.
  • Healthcare Utilization: The mean number of physical examinations by physicians during the non-protocol period ranged from 1.42 to 3.31 compared to 5.78 during the paper protocol period and 6.93 during the computer protocol period.
  • Quality of Care and Patient Safety Outcome: Verbal examinations (regarding new clinical events since last appointment, e.g. myocardial infarction, angina/chest pains) of patients by physicians during the non-protocol period was lower than during the protocol periods. Physicians asking general health questions was not affected by the protocol.
The information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only.