This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://digital.ahrq.gov/contact-us. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.
Please go to digital.ahrq.gov for current information.

Pilot study of a web-based antibiotic decision management guide

Authors
Bochicchio, G. V., Smit, P. A., Moore, R., Bochicchio, K., Auwaerter, P., Johnson, S. B., Scalea, T., Bartlett, J. G.
Journal
J Am Coll Surg
Publication Date
2006 Mar
Volume
202
Issue
3
Pages
459-67
  • HIT Description: Decision support, Mobile computing More info...
  • Purpose of Study: To determine the impact of physician use of a PDA loaded with an antibiotics guide
  • Years of study: 2001-2002
  • Study Design: Randomized controlled trial
  • Outcomes: Impact on health care effectiveness and quality
Summary:
  • Settings: Trauma center at University of Maryland hospital
  • Intervention: Johns Hopkins Antibiotics Guide provided peer-reviewed infectious disease management guidelines via PDA at the point of care
  • Evaluation Method: 6 month randomized pilot study of 12 trauma and critical care fellows. Outcomes were antibiotic decision accuracy as well as 3 and 6 month examination scores on knowledge of infectious disease management
  • Description: The electronic Johns Hopkins Antibiotic Guide (JHABX) was loaded on Blackberry PDAs. The program has 3 modules: diagnosis, pathogen, and antibiotic. Serial updates were available on demand and transmitted through the bi-directional wireless Mobitex network
  • Quality of Care and Patient Safety Outcome: Antibiotic decision accuracy in the intervention group improved significantly, from 66% during the initial 3 months to 86.6% in the following 3 months. The group also improved their infectious disease exam scores significantly from baseline to month 3, and from month 3 to month 6. There was no notable improvement in the control groups.
The information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only.