This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://digital.ahrq.gov/contact-us. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.
Please go to digital.ahrq.gov for current information.

Timer: a new objective measure of consultation content and its application to computer assisted consultations

Authors
Pringle M, Robins S, Brown G
Journal
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)
Publication Date
1986 Jul 5
Volume
293
Issue
6538
Pages
20-2
  • HIT Description: Computer-generated preventive care reminders. More info...
  • Purpose of Study: Compare consultations with a computer and reminder to consultations without computer using ÒTime Interval Medical Event RecorderÓ (Timer).
  • Years of study: Not Available
  • Study Design: Case study w/concurrent control
  • Outcomes: Impact on health care effectivness/quality, Impact on efficiency, utilization, costs, Impact on health care access
Summary:
  • Settings: Clinics staffed by 3 physicians at a health center in Collingham, UK.
  • Intervention: Consultations with a computer with preventive care reminders were compared to control consultations.
  • Evaluation Method: Measures of length of consultation, the problems being dealt with, the physical activity, the verbal activity, and the secondary tasks being attempted using ÒTimerÓ.
  • Healthcare Utilization: ÒTimerÓ showed that control consultations lasted an average of 6 minutes 58 seconds. The doctors spent 35% of their time on administration, and patients and doctors were both conversational for just 33% of the consultation. Giving information was the most common verbal activity (48% of the duration of the consultation) with silence accounting for 21% of the time. When the computer was used the average consultation was longer, at 7 minutes and 46 seconds. The doctor's contribution to the consultation appeared to have increased. Patient centered speech fell from 36% in controls to 28% of the duration of the consultation when the computer was used, while doctor centered speech rose from 30% to 34.5%.
  • Quality of Care and Patient Safety Outcome: Exploring patient concepts, education, management sharing, and prevention were attempted during 28% of the control consultations and 40% of the computer consultations. This was accounted for by the increase in prevention (p 0.001).
The information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only.